And we wonder why there’s an inequality problem.
On January 6, 2015, Dave Johnson writes on AlterNet:
Many people don’t understand our country’s problem of concentration of income and wealth because they don’t see it. People just don’t understand how much wealth there is at the top now—so much that it’s beyond most people’s ability to comprehend.
If people understood just how concentrated wealth has become in our country and the effect is has on our politics, our democracy and our people, they would demand our politicians do something about it.
How Much Is a Billion?
Some Wall Street types (and others) make over a billion dollars a year – each year. How much is a billion dollars? How can you visualize an amount of money so high? Here is one way to think about it: The median household income in the US is around $29,000. If you make $29,000 a year, and don’t spend a single penny of it, it will take you 34,482 years to save a billion dollars. . . . (Please come back and read the rest of this after you have recovered.)
What Do People Do With So Much?
What do people do with all that money? Good question. After you own a stable of politicians who will cut your taxes, there are still a few more things you can buy. Let’s see what $1 billion can get you.
Cars
This is a Maybach. Most people don’t even know there is something called a Maybach. The one in the picture, the Landaulet model, costs $1 million. (Rush Limbaugh, who has 5 homes in Palm Beach, drives a cheaper Maybach 57 S — but makes up for it by owning 6 of them.)
Your $1 billion will only buy you a thousand Maybach Landaulets.
Here are pics of just some of Ralph Lauren’s collection of cars. This is not a museum; this is one person’s private collection.
Luxury Hotels
This is the Mardan Palace Hotel in Turkey, Burj Al Arab in Dubai.
Here is a photo gallery of some other expensive hotels, where people pay $20-30,000 per night. A billion dollars will buy you a $20,000 room every night for 137 years.
Remember to send me a postcard!Yachts
Le Grand Bleu – $90 million.
Some people spend as much as $200 million or more on yachts.
You can buy ten $100 million yachts with a billion dollars.
Private Jets
Of course, you can also get around via private jet. There are approximately 15,000 private jets registered in the U.S., according to NBAA. (Note: See the IPS High-Flyers study.)
This is a Gulfstream G550. You can pick one up for around $40 million, depending. Maybe $60 million top-of-the-line.
Your billion will buy you 25 of these.
Private Islands
If the rabble are getting you down you can always escape to a private island.
This one is going for only $24.5 million – castle included. You can only buy 40 of these with your billion.
Mansions
This modest home (it actually is, for the neighborhood it is in) is offered right now at only about $8 million. I ride my bike past it on my regular exercise route, while I think about how the top tax rate used to be high enough to have good athletic facilities, schools and roads, and we didn’t even have deficits.
Here are a few nearby homes up for sale.
You can buy 125 houses like this one with your billion.
Luxury Items
Here is an article about ten watches that are more expensive than a Ferrari.
The one in this picture costs more than $5 million. You can buy 200 of these with your billion.
Let’s Go Shopping
So you say to yourself, “I want me some of that. I’d like to place the following order, please.”
- One Maybach Landaulet for $1 million to drive around in. (Actually to be driven around in.)
- One $100 million yacht for when I want to get seasick.
- One Gulfstream G550 private jet for $40 million.
- One private island for $24.5 million (castle included) for when I want to escape the masses.
- One $8 million estate for when I have to go ashore and mingle with the masses (but not too close.)
- One $5 million watch so I can have one.
- Total: $178.5 million.
My change after paying with a billion-dollar bill is a meager $821.5 million left over. I might be hard-up for cash after my spending spree, but I can still stay in a $20,000 room every night for 112 and 1/2 years.
As you can see, $1 billion is more than enough to really live it up. People today are amassing multiples of billions, paying very little in taxes and using it in ways that harm the rest of us.
How Extreme Is the Concentration?
Now you have a way to visualize just how much money is concentrated at the very top. And the concentration is increasing. The top 1 percent took in 23.5 percent of all of the country’s income in 2007. In 1979 they only took in 8.9% percent
It is concentrating at the expense of the rest of us. Between 1979 and 2008, the top 5 percent of American families saw their real incomes increase 73 percent, according to Census data. Over the same period, the lowest-income fifth (20 percent of us) saw a decrease in real income of 4.1 percent. The rest were just stagnant or saw very little increase. This is why people are borrowing more and more, falling further and further behind. (From the Working Group on Extreme Inequality)
Income vs. Wealth
There are a few people who make hundreds of millions of income in a single year. Some people make more than $1 billion in a year. But that is in a single year. If you make vast sums every year, eventually it starts to add up. (And then there is the story of inherited wealth, passed down and growing for generation after generation…)
Top 1 percent owns more than 90 percent of us combined. “In 2007, the richest 1 percent of U.S. households owned 33.8 percent of the nation’s private wealth. That’s more than thecombined wealth of the bottom 90 percent.” (Also from the Working Group on Extreme Inequality)
400 people have as much wealth as half of our population. The combined net worth of the Forbes 400 wealthiest Americans in 2007: $1.5 trillion. The combined net worth of the poorest 50 percent of American households: $1.6 trillion.
Corporate wealth is also personal wealth. When you hear about corporations doing well, think about this chart:
The top 1 percent also own 50.9 percent of all stocks, bonds, and mutual fund assets. The top 10 percent own 90.3 percent.
Worse Than Egypt
In fact our country’s concentration of wealth is worse than Egypt. Richard Eskow writes,
Imagine: A government run by and for the rich and powerful. Leaders who lecture others about “sacrifice” and deficits while cutting taxes for corporations and the wealthy. A system so corrupt that rich executives can break the law without fear of being punished. Increasing poverty and hardship even as the stock market rises. And now, a nation caught between a broken political system and a populist movement that could be hijacked by religious extremists at any moment.
Here’s the reality: Income inequality is actually greater in the United States than it is in Egypt. Politicians here have close financial ties to big corporations, both personally and through their campaigns. Corporate lawbreakers often do go unpunished. Poverty and unemployment statistics for US minorities are surprisingly similar to Egypt’s.
The Harmful Effect on the Rest Of Us
This concentration is having a harmful effect on the rest of us, and even on the wealthy. When income becomes so concentrated people who would otherwise think they are well off look up the ladder, see vastly more wealth accumulating, and think they are not doing all that well after all. This leads to dissatisfaction and risk-taking, in an effort to get even more. And this risk-taking is what leads to financial collapse.
Aside from the resultant risk of financial collapse, the effect of so much in the hands of so few is also bad psychologically. People need to feel they earned that they have earned what they have, and develop theories about why they have so much when others do not. Bizzare and cruel explanations like Ayn Rand’s psychopathic theories about “producers” and “parasites” take hold. Regular people become little more than commodities, blamed for their misery (“personal responsibility”) as they become ever poorer.
Teddy Roosevelt, speaking to the educators about “False Standards Resulting From Swollen Fortunes,” warned that while teachers believe their ideals to be worth sacrifice and so do non-renumerative work for the good of others, seeing great wealth makes people think that obtaining wealth is itself a lofty ideal,
The chief harm done by men of swollen fortune to the community is not the harm that the demagogue is apt to depict as springing from their actions, but the effect that their success sets up a false standard, and serves as a bad example to the rest of us. If we do not ourselves attach an exaggerated importance to the rich man who is distinguished only by his riches, this rich man would have a most insignificant influence over us.
Societies that are more equal do better. In the book The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better, Richard G. Wilkinson and Kate Pickett make the case that great inequality harms us physically as well as spiritually, and the these harmful effects show up across society. The book examines social relations, mental health, drug use, physical health, life expectancy, violence, social mobility and other effects and show how inequality worsens each.
Influence Buying
There is a problem of the effect on our democracy from the influence that extreme, concentrated wealth buys. In the book Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer–and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class, Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson make the case that the anti-democracy changes we have seen in America since the late 1970s that led to intense concentration of wealth and income are the intentional result of an organized campaign by the wealthy and businesses to use their wealth to, well, buy even more wealth.
The secretive Koch brothers are said to have a net worth of $21.5 billion each and are particularly influential. They financed the Tea Party movement and along with big corporations and other billionaires they financed the massive assault of TV ads in the midterm elections that helped change the makeup of the Congress. And now Congress is paying them back,
Nine of the 12 new Republicans on the panel signed a pledge distributed by a Koch-founded advocacy group — Americans for Prosperity — to oppose the Obama administration’s proposal to regulate greenhouse gases. Of the six GOP freshman lawmakers on the panel, five benefited from the group’s separate advertising and grassroots activity during the 2010 campaign.
… Republicans on the committee have launched an agenda of the sort long backed by the Koch brothers. A top early goal: restricting the reach of the Environmental Protection Agency, which oversees the Kochs’ core energy businesses.
We owe it to ourselves to come to grips with this problem. We owe it to democracy to begin taxing high incomes and inheritance again. We owe it to future generations to use a temporary wealth tax to pay off the debt.
http://www.alternet.org/economy/9-photos-reveal-americas-obscene-division-wealth
Income and wealth (OWNERSHIP) Inequality is the most pressing economic issue of our times. Policies that our current Democratic politicians are proposing Senators (Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders excluded) would only help on the margin––failing to address the REAL issue of CONCENTRATED CAPITAL OWNERSHIP. Republican policies by contrast, would only accentuate the disparity trends already in place, and make things much worse.
If the 99 percent really want solutions to income and wealth inequality, they need to WAKE UP and learn about the workable policies that would empower EVERY individual child, woman, and man to acquire personal wealth-creating, income-producing capital assets simultaneously with the growth of the economy. Policies, without taking from those who already ONN America and which protect private property rights, are already formulated to accomplish the objective of broadening capital ownership, grow the economy, create REAL jobs and enable EVERY American to contribute productively to the development of products and services that society needs and wants.
Such Just Third Way solutions are embodied in the proposed Capital Homestead Act, a central platform of the Unite America Party, which is open for all politicians and political parties to adopt and implement.
