As lawmakers watch closely, President Ronald Reagan signs into law the 1986 Tax Reform Act. (AP Photo/Bob Daugherty)
“If we want to address the inequality crisis, we must prevent corporations from sitting on hoards of untaxed cash.”
On August 3, 2015, David Cay Johnson writes in The Nation:
More than a third of a century after Ronald Reagan led America down a costly and unnecessary path into extreme income and wealth inequality, the opportunity to restore broad prosperity is rising before us. This is a moment not for despair, but resolve—and hard work.
Income inequality has become so outrageous that even Republicans vying for their party’s presidential nomination are talking about it, though not their party’s role in creating it or any workable solutions. On television the talking heads wring their hands, saying, “If only we could afford the costs of digging ourselves out of the economic hell most Americans have been shoved into.”
Actually, America has an immense pool of money that can be put to work closing the nation’s extreme inequality gap. Doing so will also improve our health, longevity, level of education, and knowledge.
Before getting to that, though, let’s take a quick look at the latest data.
In June, for the first time, the Internal Revenue Service released data on not just the top 1 percent, but also the top one-thousandth of 1 percent. The report excludes dependent children who file their own tax returns because they have a trust fund or work.
Even for those who know that the average income reported by nine out of 10 households has fallen back to the level it stood at in 1966, this is a shocking report.
My analysis shows that from 2003 through 2012, the bottom 90 percent of Americans saw their incomes decline by 6 percent, or about $200 a month.
Every penny of increased income went to the top 10 percent, but even there it was heavily skewed to the very few at the very top. Slightly more than half of all the increased income in the country went to the 1.36 million taxpayers who make up the top 1 percent. The most shocking detail: Just one in 1,000 of those top taxpayers collected 8 percent of all the increased income in the entire nation.
Think about that. America has 136 million primary taxpayer households. Over those ten years just 1,361 households raked in 8 percent of all the increased income in America.
Those one in 100,000 households averaged $161 million each in 2012. They paid 17.6 percent of their money in federal income taxes, about the same share as a single worker making just $80,000.
The awful truth is that the great industrial engine that once created rising prosperity for the vast majority has been converted into a mining operation. Instead of creating new wealth by making ever more useful widgets and services ever more efficiently, today’s economic titans mine the pockets of the many.
Public policy—laws passed by Congress, regulatory agency rules, and lax oversight of business—makes this mining economy possible.
We see this in the private-equity, high-speed trading, and hedge-fund operators who combine scads of borrowed money, favorable accounting rules, and offshore companies that block taxes to report huge profits. They rarely create new enterprises or improve existing ones. Instead they strip companies of their assets and froth the stock exchanges so they can collect profitable bubbles.
The biggest multinational corporations don’t even pay corporate income taxes. Rather they profit off them, something I exposed 13 years ago and that a three-volume study by the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation later confirmed.
What makes this possible are a few seemingly innocuous words slipped into the 1986 Tax Reform Act that hardly anyone noticed at the time. Those words allow multinational corporations to evade the caps on how much cash and near-cash domestic companies can hold by simply moving their profits offshore.
Since 1909 Congress has limited cash hoarding because it damages the economy. Just as the economy would collapse if everyone cashed their paychecks and stuffed greenbacks in their mattresses, so too is economic growth damaged when corporations hoard cash instead of reinvesting.
But under the 1986 law American companies pay royalties, rents, and fees to their offshore subsidiaries, using accounting alchemy to convert profits into expenses. As long as those profits are held in so-called deferral accounts with an offshore mailing address, no taxes are due.
You would get the same deal if Congress let you take a deduction for every dollar in your right pocket that you moved to your left pocket and kept there.
The next part, though, is even more perverse: the multinationals buy the Treasury bonds that the federal government sells because it didn’t collect those corporate taxes right away. The government then pays these multinationals interest on their deferred taxes.
Do this for long enough and the magic of compound interest will result in more money than the value of the taxes owed, which are eroded by inflation. In effect Uncle Sam loans these companies their taxes at 0 percent interest and then pays them interest on the loan. If you could get a bank to do that for you when you buy a house, after three decades with no payments you would have enough money to pay the bank the deferred purchase price and enjoy three to four times the house’s price in cash.
Of course, no banker is dumb enough to give you that deal. But Congress gives it to multinationals like Apple and GE and to billionaires like Warren Buffett every day. So when their shareholder reports indicate that they paid a tiny percentage of their profits in taxes, they really made a profit and paid Uncle Sam a small fee on their profits from deferring payment.
Here’s the good news buried in that outrage: These huge corporate deferral accounts can be tapped to pay for investments that will move us away from extreme inequality, generate millions of new jobs, and create future wealth through basic research and improved infrastructure.
The 2004 American Jobs Creation Act gave multinationals an 85 percent discount on offshore profits brought home. When the proposal was being discussed, proponents said it would create 660,000 jobs. But as soon as the law took effect its biggest beneficiary, Pfizer, started firing 40,000 workers. Pfizer escaped about $10 billion in taxes. Like some other companies, Pfizer used the tax savings to buy back its own stock, which increased the value of stock options held by executives.
Instead of letting companies bring this offshore money home after paying little or no tax, as Congress did in 2004, those deferrals can be ended in a way that will stimulate the economy.
