On August 13, 2015, Alan Pyke writes on ThinkProgress:
It’s the worst time in 36 years to be a renter in America. The median rent nationwide now takes up 30.2 percent of the median American’s income, the highest cost burden recorded by Zillow since the real estate firm began tracking the figure in 1979.
In the late 1980s and throughout the 1990s, the median American looking to lease a home could expect to spend a little less than a quarter of what she earned on rent. Last year at this time, the median cost burden for renters was 29.5 percent of income. The new figure cracks the formal 30 percent threshold economists and housing experts use to define rent affordability. Because it’s calculated based on median income and median rent rather than using data about what actual renters earn and pay, the figure inevitably smooths out some of the lived experience of the rental crisis in America. But if rent is now unaffordable even for that hypothetical median renter, that suggests a problem that was once acute to certain low-income communities has now become a mainstream tenant experience.
Zillow’s newest number attempts to give a snapshot of the situation renters face nationwide. In particular pockets of America, the situation is even more dire according to separate Zillow figures from 2014. New Orleans tenants can expect to spend 35 percent of what they earn on rent, two-and-a-half times the historical average for the city. The median New York City rent gobbles up almost 40 cents of every dollar the median New Yorker earns. Los Angeles residents face a rental market where the median home will cost nearly half the median income. Even smaller communities like Ithaca, NY, and Flagstaff, AZ, were well above the 30.2 percent national median rent burden figure the firm now reports as an all-time high.
Looking at individual tenants instead of abstract estimates produces an even more startling sense of how actual Americans are faring in those markets. Census data suggest that half of all tenants nationwide are paying more than 30 percent of their actual income in rent, according to a 2013 analysis from Harvard’s Joint Center for Housing Studies. One in every four renting households spends at least 50 cents of every dollar they earn on rent, the report said. Even among renter families with household income as high as $75,000, nearly one in five are paying rents higher than the 30 percent of income that housing experts define as affordable.
In theory, it shouldn’t be possible for rents to accelerate this far while incomes stagnate. As Zillow’s newest report indicates, the monthly costs of homeownership are now roughly half the monthly cost of rent. Normally that would help cool the rental market. But while it’s been almost seven years since the financial crisis, these are still far from normal times.
The burst of the housing bubble and the ensuing fraud-ridden foreclosure crisis drove huge numbers of people back into the rental market: About 900,000 new renter households have entered the market each year since 2010, nearly double the highest average annual rates recorded in recent decades, according to Harvard numbers from this year. The slow recovery and ongoing stagnation of working families’ incomes, combined with budget cuts to federal programs that support housing affordability and a voracious appetite for luxury housing development on behalf of the rich, have interfered with the normal function of the market and allowed landlords to continue charging higher prices.
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2015/08/13/3691430/zillow-median-renter-report/
The saddening reality is that Americans are wage slaves or welfare slaves, constantly struggling to maintain the necessary income to sustain themselves and their families. This is due to tectonic shifts in the technologies of production and low cost-of-production competitive globalization that is destroying jobs and devaluing the worth of labor. Americans also have become consumer debt slaves in order to provide some aspect of general affluence, but they are ALWAYS in debt. Because a mortgage requires a level of past savings or equity in addition to the secured valuation of a home dwelling to be purchased on credit, the loan requirements are prohibitive for millions and millions of Americans who simply will never be able to qualify. Their ONLY choice is to rent in a market where there are more people needing to rent than there are rental units. Thus, rental prices are trending upward and out-of-reach for more and more Americans.
The root problem is the vast majority of American are income-short to support themselves and their families in general affluence. This is because their ONLY source of income is a job, or taxpayer-supported welfare dependency. Unlike the rich, they OWN no wealth-creating, income-producing capital assets (the non-human means of producing products and services). They have ONLY their labor to sell and thus must compete with millions and millions of other labor slaves, with no other opportunity to become a productive capital OWNER and thus wealthy.
What the vast majority of Americans need is more INCOME and the ONLY way to earn more INCOME without having to be restricted to their labor input, is to be empowered to acquire personal OWNERSHIP in the FUTURE creation of productive capital assets using insured, interest-free capital credit repayable out of the FUTURE earnings of investments in viable and successful corporations growing the economy. Using insured, interest-free financial mechanisms we can free the growth of the economy from the slavery of past savings and instead finance future growth on the basis of FUTURE earnings using the logic of corporate finance, which is that investments must pay for themselves. This solution is central to the proposed Capital Homestead Act or Economic Democracy Act. See http://www.cesj.org/learn/capital-homesteading/, http://www.cesj.org/learn/capital-homesteading/capital-homestead-act-a-plan-for-getting-ownership-income-and-power-to-every-citizen/ and http://www.cesj.org/learn/capital-homesteading/capital-homestead-act-summary/. See http://cesj.org/learn/capital-homesteading/ and http://cesj.org/…/uploads/Free/capitalhomesteading-s.pdf.
Another program is the Homeowners Equity Corporations (HEC), which is designed to turn home renters into owners. HECs would obtain acquisition loans from commercial banks to purchase distressed properties at the current market value, which in turn would discount the loans at the local Federal Reserve at a rate reflecting transaction costs and a revised risk premium. The homes could then be leased at a realistic market rate to their former owners or new tenants. The tenant would earn shares in the HEC as lease payments were made, sufficient to cover debt service, maintenance, and taxes. When the acquisition loan for a particular property was fully paid, the tenant could exchange his or her HEC shares for title, or continue as a tenant/shareholder at a reduced lease payment, sufficient to cover maintenance and property taxes.
See http://www.cesj.org/resources/articles-index/hecs-saving-homes-building-resident-equity/ and http://www.cesj.org/learn/capital-homesteading/ch-vehicles/homeowners-equity-corporations-hecs/
