Mark Lennihan/AP- After 29-year-old Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s stunning upset against Rep. Joe Crowley in the New York Democratic congressional primary in June, the word “socialist” was repeatedly used to describe her.
- “Socialist” remains a dirty, and often misunderstood, term in the realm of US politics.
- In general, socialists believe the government should provide a range of basic services to the public, such as health care and education, for free or at a significant discount.
- Ocasio-Cortez became the youngest woman elected to Congress in US history in the 2018 midterms on November 6.
- The Bronx native was sworn into Congress in January.
- In his 2019 State of the Union address, President Donald Trump expressed concern about “new calls to adopt socialism in our country.”
On February 5, 2019, John Haltiwanger writes on Business Insider:
After 29-year-old Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s stunning upset against Rep. Joe Crowley in the New York Democratic congressional primary in June, the word “socialist” was repeatedly used to describe her.
Ocasio-Cortez became the youngest woman elected to Congress in US history in the 2018 midterms on November 6.
The Bronx native was sworn into Congress in January and has become a bit of an obsession for conservatives.
She’s a registered member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and is a self-described socialist.
“Socialist” remains a dirty, and often misunderstood, term in the realm of US politics. The Cold War, in which animosity and paranoia toward the Soviet Union was pervasive in the US, is largely to thank for that.
During his 2019 State of the Union address, President Donald Trumptapped into these sentiments.
“Here, in the United States, we are alarmed by new calls to adopt socialism in our country,” Trump said to cheers from many in the audience as he addressed the chaotic situation in Venezuela and alluded to politicians like Ocasio-Cortez.
Trump added, “America was founded on liberty and independence – not government coercion, domination, and control. We are born free, and we will stay free. Tonight, we renew our resolve that America will never be a socialist country.”
But what does it mean to be a socialist versus a Democratic socialist, and is there even a difference?
What is socialism? It depends on who you’re talking to.
A socialist, in the traditional sense, is an adherent of socialism.
Socialism can be defined as “a system of social organization in which private property and the distribution of income are subject to social control.”
In other words, it’s a state-controlled economy in which the state controls the means of production (factories, offices, resources, and firms). There are also forms of socialism in which the means of production are controlled and owned by workers.
From an academic standpoint, there’s an ongoing debate about what socialism really is.
“The academic debates about socialism’s ‘meaning’ are huge and arcane and rife with disagreements, but what all definitions have in common is either the elimination of the market or its strict containment,” Frances Fox Piven, a political scientist at the City University of New York and a former DSA board member, told Vox.
What do socialists believe in?
In general, socialists believe the government should provide a range of basic services to the public, such as health care and education, for free or at a significant discount.
In the present day, “Democratic socialist” and “socialist” are often treated as interchangeable terms, which can be confusing given Democratic socialists don’t necessarily think the government should immediately take control of all aspects of the economy.
They do, however, generally believe the government should help provide for people’s most basic needs and help all people have an equal chance at achieving success.
Ocasio-Cortez’s platform, for example, calls for Medicare for all, tuition-free college, and treats housing as a right.
Democratic socialists are committed to democracy
Democratic socialists also believe strongly in democracy and democratic principles. They are by no means proponents of authoritarian government systems many Americans associate socialism with.
As the DSA’s website states: “At the root of our socialism is a profound commitment to democracy, as means and end. As we are unlikely to see an immediate end to capitalism tomorrow, DSA fights for reforms today that will weaken the power of corporations and increase the power of working people.”
To put it another way, they don’t feel socialism should be forced on people, but they are fundamentally anti-capitalist and believe the government should urge privately owned businesses toward granting workers as much control as possible.
The DSA and Democratic socialists like Ocasio-Cortez place a great deal of emphasis on social justice in conjunction with pushing for an economy that’s largely controlled by workers.
The DSA supports reforms that would decrease the influence of money in politics, empower ordinary people in workplaces and the economy, and restructure gender and cultural relationships to be more equitable, according to its website.
To put this into context, Ocasio-Cortez’s platform calls for an end to the war on drugs, the demilitarization of police departments, and the abolishment of for-profit prisons.
Here’s how Sen. Bernie Sanders, a self-declared Democratic socialist, defined it in a 2006 interview: “I think [democratic socialism] means the government has got to play a very important role in making sure that as a right of citizenship all of our people have healthcare; that as a right, all of our kids, regardless of income, have quality childcare, are able to go to college without going deeply into debt; that it means we do not allow large corporations and moneyed interests to destroy our environment; that we create a government in which it is not dominated by big money interest.”
“I mean, to me, it means democracy, frankly,” Sanders added. “That’s all it means.”
Gary Reber Comments:
To quote: “To put it another way, they don’t feel socialism should be forced on people, but they are fundamentally anti-capitalist and believe the government should urge privately owned businesses toward granting workers as much control as possible.”
What is troubling about this definition of “anti-capitalist,” is that can mean either they are against hoggism as in “capitalism,” whereby a tiny few own the productive capital asset means of production, or they are against individuals own singularly or in assemblies of individuals (corporations) private property rights in capital assets.
I believe it is the former that they are against.
But what to do about the concentration of productive capital asset wealth is not a subject anyone in the progressive “democratic socialists” camp is addressing. They put forth solutions at the edges, such a employee or worker ownership of corporations, which are necessary components of the solution, but they have yet to get to the core of the problem and the solution.
The problem: concentrated capital asset ownership and the continuation of such.
The solution: knocking down barriers to the extension of insured, interest-free capital credit to EVERY child, woman, and man (citizens). in which the lenders are insured against failure of the capital credit loans to pay off the principal solely out of the future earnings of the investments in the qualified corporations growing our economy.
While this is the core solution, there are other system components that need reform in support of the implementation of this core solution.
For a far more in-depth analysis, see my article “Economic Democracy And Binary Economics: Solutions For A Troubled Nation and Economy” at http://www.foreconomicjustice.org/?p=11.
