On July 6, 2012, Jerry Bartash writes on MarketWatch.com:
The U.S. created just 80,000 jobs in June — about one-third of them temporary — as evidence hardened that the economy has hit another rough patch.
The unemployment rate was unchanged at 8.2%, the Labor Department said Friday.
In U.S. markets, stock prices SPX -0.94% fell. Economists surveyed by MarketWatch were expecting a net increase of 100,000 jobs in June. See Market Snapshot.
The disappointing employment report adds to fresh worries about the U.S. economy at a time when growth is slowing around the world and Washington is gridlocked about how to address the malaise.
The decline in job growth has raised the odds of further Federal Reserve intervention in the economy. The central bank will hold its next major meeting in late July and the Fed could launch a new program to buy bonds to try to drive down interest rates.
The poor employment report is also a blow to President Barack Obama as he tries to fend off Republican candidate Mitt Romney and win reelection in November. Romney, a former businessman, has blamed the high unemployment rate on White House policies and made the economy the centerpiece of his campaign against the president. Read reaction to jobs report.
There is only one sound and logical solution and that is to stop the ability of greedy rich people to manipulate the lives of people who struggle with declining labor worker earnings and job opportunities, and then accumulate the bulk of the money through monopolized productive capital ownership. Our scientists, engineers, and executive managers who are not owners themselves, except for those in the highest employed positions, are encouraged to work to destroy employment by making the those who own productive capital more productive. How much employment can be destroyed by substituting machines for people is a measure of their success––always focused on producing at the lowest cost. Only the people who already own productive capital are the beneficiaries of their work, as they systematically concentrate more and more capital ownership in their stationary 1 percent ranks. Yet the 1 percent are not the people who do the overwhelming consuming. The result is the consumer populous is not able to get the money to buy the products and services produced as a result of substituting machines for people. And yet you can’t have mass production without mass human consumption. It is the exponential disassociation of production and consumption that is the problem in the United States economy, and the reason that ordinary citizens must gain access to productive capital ownership to improve their economic well-being.
If Obama is not clear on this simple explanation and unable to boldly lead the United States in the direction of empowering ordinary Americans to acquire private, individual ownership in future income-producing productive capital creation and benefit from the financial betterment that such ownership provides, then the solution, though long-term in its implementation, will remain obscured by the incessant focus on “job creation” rather than “ownership creation.”
Binary economist Louis Kelso postulated: “When consumer earning power is systematically acquired in the course of the normal operations of the economy by people who need and want more consumer goods and services, the production of goods and services should rise to unprecedented levels; the quality and craftsmanship of goods and services, freed of the cornercutting imposed by the chronic shortage of consumer purchasing power, should return to their former high levels; competition should be brisk; and the purchasing power of money should remain stable year after year.”
Without this necessary balance hopeless poverty, social alienation, and economic breakdown will persist, even though the American economy is ripe with the physical, technical, managerial, and engineering prerequisites for improving the lives of the 99 percent majority. Why? Because there is a crippling organizational malfunction that prevents making full use of the technological prowess that we have developed. The system does not fully facilitate connecting the majority of citizens, who have unsatisfied needs and wants, to the productive capital assets enabling productive efficiency and economic growth.
Kelso said, “We are a nation of industrial sharecroppers who work for somebody else and have no other source of income. If a man owns something that will produce a second income, he’ll be a better customer for the things that American industry produces. But the problem is how to get the working man [and woman] that second income.”
The closest that academia and advisors to politicians ever get is the use of the words “concentrated wealth.” They consistently avoids defining “wealth” and targeting “concentrated ownership” of the non-human factor of production––productive capital, which is embodied in productive land, structures, machines, superautomation, robotics, digital computerized operations, etc. They continues to advocate for job creation rather than ownership creation.
We need justice-committed leaders, especially those who want to end the corruption built into our exclusionary system of monopoly capitalism––the main source of corruption of any political system, democratic or otherwise. Neither Obama or Romney or any other presidential, congressional or state and local politician fits that job description.
What we really need in this 2012 presidential election year is a national discussion on the topic of the importance of capital ownership and how we can expand the base of private capital ownership simultaneously with the creation of new capital formation, with the aim of building long-term financial security for all Americans through accumulating a viable capital estate.
We need a recognition in America that we should deliberately begin to broaden the productive capital ownership base in a way that is consistent with the laws of property and the Constitutional safeguards of the rights of men and women to own property and be productive.
What needs to be adjusted is the opportunity to produce, not the redistribution of income after it is produced. Otherwise, there will be no alternative to the wreckage of unemployment and underemployment and government taxpayer support through income redistribution and debt borrowing, which will be never-ending until there is a total collapse of the economy.
Please see my article “Democratic Capitalism And Binary Economics: Solutions For A Troubled Nation and Economy” at http://foreconomicjustice.com/11/economic-justice/ or follow me on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/For-Economic-Justice/347893098576250 and http://www.facebook.com/editorgary
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-posts-weak-80000-jobs-gain-in-june-2012-07-06
