19th Ave New York, NY 95822, USA

Apple In Front Lines Of Trump Trade War (Demo)

Apple in front lines of Trump trade war
© Getty Images
On June 25, 2019, emily Biennium writes on The Hill:
Apple is finding itself on the front lines of President Trump’s trade war as the U.S. considers imposing tariffs on virtually all goods from China, including on popular iPhones and Mac computers.

The tech giant — along with a range of other companies that manufacture products for U.S. consumers in China — will be closely watching the Group of 20 summit this week, where Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping will try to reach an agreement to stave off the U.S. plans to impose tariffs of 25 percent on another $300 billion in Chinese imports.

But if the two leaders can’t come to a deal, Apple is facing a worst-case scenario that would likely force the company to increase prices for customers and even move some of its manufacturing business away from China.

Daniel Ives, an equity analyst with Wedbush Securities, described it as a “white-knuckle period” for Apple and its investors.

“There’s no gray area,” Ives said. “There’s either breakthrough, talks, and the [proposed tariff] doesn’t happen, or it starts to spiral,” Ives said. “In that situation, it really becomes a quagmire both for Apple as well as their investors.”

Trump has initiated three other rounds of tariffs on Chinese goods since he came into office, but the latest proposal specifically targets consumer products including cameras, ink and toner cartridges, laptop computers, mobile phones and much more. The other rounds targeted technology parts and components, but this time “directly consumer-facing” items would be affected.

Apple has become a poster child for the tech industry’s battle against the escalating trade war, assuming responsibility as one of the largest and most influential companies that would take a hit if the administration greenlights the tariffs.

Last week, Apple asked the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative to exclude its products from Trump’s tariff hit list, arguing the cost would harm Apple’s ability to compete with Chinese companies such as Huawei and chip away at Apple’s ability to contribute to the U.S. economy.

“U.S. tariffs would also weigh on Apple’s global competitiveness,” Apple wrote to U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer. “A U.S. tariff would … tilt the playing field in favor of our global competitors.”

The company is asking Lighthizer to strike Apple products from the proposed tariffs, which, if implemented, would affect the iPhone, iPad, Mac, AirPods, AppleTV and more.

The average price of the iPhone could increase by $110 to $140, while the price of Mac laptops could go up between 15 and 18 percent, according to Ives’s estimates.

“Apple’s products are used by American families, students, businesses, government agencies, schoolsand hospitals to communicate, teach, improve health outcomes, and enhance creativity and enterprise,” Apple wrote, noting that the company is “the largest U.S. corporate taxpayer to the U.S. Treasury” and has pledged to contribute $350 billion over five years to the country’s economy.

“We urge you not to proceed with these tariffs,” the company concluded.

Reports over the past week have indicated that Apple would consider moving 15 to 30 percent of its manufacturing out of China in light of the unpredictable trade war. But tech trade groups that count Apple among their members told The Hill the process of moving out of China would prove enormously complicated and onerous.

“The largest companies have invested millions, even billions in infrastructure, in training employees, in their operations overseas,” said Sage Chandler, vice president of international trade at the Consumer Technology Association (CTA). “It’s not that easy to just go someplace else and start it all over again.”

An estimated 5 million Chinese jobs rely on Apple’s manufacturing in China, and Apple employs approximately 10,000 people in the country.

Apple has an important leg up over other companies railing against the proposed tariffs: company CEO Tim Cook’s close ties to Trump.

Just last week, Cook met privately with the president to discuss “trade” and “U.S. investment,” among other topics, a White House spokesperson confirmed to The Hill.

Trump has expressed a fondness for the business leader, and in March publicly touted their close relationship. “People like Tim, you’re expanding all over and doing things that I really wanted you to right from the beginning,” Trump said at a White House meeting focused on technology education. “I used to say, ‘Tim, you’ve got to start doing it over here,’ and you really have. I mean, you’ve really put a big investment in our country. We appreciate it very much.” Trump went on to refer to Cook by the name “Tim Apple,” which he later defended as an intentional turn of phrase.

Cook has sought to curry favor with top administration figures, in February joining a White House workforce initiative helmed by Trump’s elder daughter and senior adviser Ivanka Trump and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross.

And he has turned to K Street, with Apple in 2018 shelling out an eye-popping $6.68 million on lobbying.

“Cook has become a pseudo-ambassador between [the] U.S. and China,” Ives said. “Cook has spent many, many years building up Apple’s presence in China and he’s also built up a lot of political capital within D.C.”

“He’s one of the most respected business leaders in the world,” he added. “I think he has a strong voice that people listen to, both within the White House as well as within the business community.”

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative last week held hearings with a range of companies — including many from the tech sector — about how the tariffs could harm U.S. businesses and even the country’s economy. About half of the $300 billion in imports are related to the tech industry.

The proposed tariffs could wind up costing the industry up to tens of billions of dollars, according to estimates from the Computing Technology Industry Association, which represents Apple, among other companies.

Linda Moore, the president and CEO of tech trade group TechNet, told The Hill that companies will likely be forced to raise prices on consumers, potentially lay off some of their workforce and pull funds away from the research and development of new technologies.

While the tech industry has railed against each round of new tariffs, the latest list has prompted the most aggressive pushback, with many companies saying they simply can’t withstand the potential duty of up to 25 percent on their products.

“Everything is hanging on that G-20 meeting between Presidents Trump and Xi,” Chandler from CTA said. “There’s a hope that there’s a deal that keeps these from going into effect.”

“But you just never know,” she said. “Each time we’ve hoped they wouldn’t go into effect, they have.”

https://thehill.com/policy/technology/450123-apple-in-front-lines-of-trump-trade-war?fbclid=IwAR2iWqhxqrJkBzOjdHfo8oLMZwfRejwEjhh1KNh9IkdF9_OZFYtzG1RFwaI#.XRIG_CCSyfo.facebook

Gary Reber Comments:
Apple Inc., and as well all other American companies, should not have and should not continue to manufacture its products in slave-wage labor and authoritarian countries, not only Communist China but all others.
What Apple Inc. is really saying is their owners’ profits would be reduced. Apple Inc., an American tech corporation, has made the choice to become dependent on Communist China for its manufacturing and assemblage of finished products. So have many other American corporations. Their owners have made these decisions solely to increase profitability by saving labor using slave-wage labor and other operational cost savings.
 
Their contribution to the U.S. economy has not been to the extent it should have been. The controlling ownership of Apple Inc. is narrow and the employees, except for those in the highest management positions, are not owners.
 
Tariffs are the only means to make it economically unattractive and unfeasible to move manufacturing from the United States to and invest in slave-wage labor and non-industrial regulated countries. We should instead be investing in developing our most technologically advanced and efficient manufacturing capabilities, with the newly formed productive capital assets owned by employees and all other citizens. We need to change the monetary and tax systems to establish equal opportunity, through free market means, for every citizen (child, woman and man) to acquire direct ownership of the new capital needed each year to produce new goods, products and services. (This also means investing in our own manufacturing capabilities at home, not in slave-wage labor, authoritarian countries.)
 
We do not need the rich or past savings to build an economy, owned by its individual citizens, that can support general affluence for EVERY citizen. We do not have to depend on the investments of the wealthy to finance private sector growth nor redistribute wealth through the tax system.
 
Financial mechanisms have been developed to finance future growth, whether by established corporations or viable start-ups, which empower EVERY child, woman, and man to acquire personal ownership stakes in the new productive capital assets formed as our economy grows responsibly. This financing creates new money backed by the underlying capital assets created using insured, interest-free capital credit, solely repayable with the full pre-tax earnings of the investments, and without the requirement of past savings on the part of the new citizen-owners.
 
The main social tool proposed for universalizing citizen access to private property ownership of productive wealth is asset-backed money and no-interest capital credit — created strictly to enable every citizen to purchase newly issued shares representing the new capital used by well-run businesses. This would offer the poorest person and the richest person alike equal access to this new means for acquiring assets that pay for themselves with their own future full, pre-tax stream of profits, and thereafter yield a stream of capital income to each owner.
 
Money creation for broadly owned private sector growth would be administered through local banks (making vetted and insured capital loans through expanded capital ownership vehicles) and the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks. (The regional Feds already have the legal authority to create new money for financing new agricultural, commercial and industrial growth.
 
Assuming both established and viable start-up corporations finance their future growth in this way, by paying out all their profits to their shareholders, corporations would escape all corporate income taxes. Paying out all corporate profits would also accelerate repayment of capital credit loans to citizens through the proposed Capital Homestead program.
 
For an in-depth overview of solutions see my article “Economic Democracy And Binary Economics: Solutions For A Troubled Nation and Economy” at http://www.foreconomicjustice.org/?p=11.

Leave a comment