19th Ave New York, NY 95822, USA

Life After Divorce (Demo)

On June 6, 2012, Sally Abrahms writes in the AARP Bulletin that more boomers are calling it quits after years of marriage, What does this mean for their economic security and our society?

“Boomers love to do everything their own way, and they are out in front on divorce, too. While the overall divorce rate in the United States has decreased since 1990, it has doubled for those over age 50.

“Reasons vary: Longer lives mean more years with an incompatible spouse; no kids to use as a reason to stay together; less stigma about splitting; more women working, some outearning their spouses; and a remarriage failure rate of 60 percent.

“The surge has spawned the term ‘gray divorce.’ As Jay Lebow, a psychologist at the Family Institute at Northwestern University, says, ‘If late-life divorce were a disease, it would be an epidemic.’

“One out of three boomers will face older age unmarried, says Susan Brown, codirector of the National Center for Family & Marriage Research at Bowling Green State University in her new study ‘The Gray Divorce Revolution.’

“That’s significant. The fact that onetime legally bound partners have gone their separate ways later in life — or are single by choice or circumstances — has many personal and societal ramifications.”

Social Security’s so-called “safety net” may not be sufficient to provide the economic security that seniors need, leaving many, if not a majority of seniors, vulnerable financially. As discussed in my post on Security Security (see http://foreconomicjustice.com/2467/10-ways-to-tune-up-social-security/), the various options to provide some level of economic security have their pros and cons, Society Security is based on “job employment,” and no one is addressing the needed solutions to providing economic security long-term as we deal with the impact of the tectonic shifts in the technologies of production, which represents a future Third Industrial Revolution. As this scarnio advances, fewer and fewer people will be needed to fill job opportunities. Private sector job creation in numbers that match the pool of people willing and able to work is constantly being eroded by physical productive capital’s (the non-human factor of production) ever increasing role.

If we as a society are to assure ALL Americans prosperity, opportunity and economic justice, and empower them to  earn enough to raise a family, build a modest savings, own a home, and secure their retirement, then we will have to direct policy making at  building an economy of universally productive individuals and households.
The majority of Americans, dependent on labor worker wages, no longer think that jobs and labor wages will return suddenly—if at all—and at a livable earnings level, that the value of their homes will re­bound, or that their limited retirement funds will soon be fully restored. Americans are scared but attribute their worsening finances to job losses, reduced hours, wage givebacks, and overall reduced earnings. They do not understand the role of productive capital driven by technological innovation and science and the requirement for them to become capital workers, as well as labor workers, to earn a viable economic future. And until we, as a society, understand how wealth is produced, how consumers earn the money to buy products and services and the nature of capital ownership, we will not be able to set a course to obtain an affluent quality of life for middle and working class citizens, where everyone can earn enough to raise a family, build a modest savings, own a home, and secure their retirement.
We are absent a national discussion of where consumers earn the money to buy products and services and the nature of capital ownership, and instead argue about policies to redistribute income or not to redistribute income. If Americans do not demand that the contenders for the office of the presidency of the United States, the Senate, and the Congress address these issues, we will have wasted the opportunity to steer the American economy in a direction that will broaden affluence. We have adequate resources, adequate knowhow, and adequate manpower to produce general affluence, but we need as a society to properly and efficiently manage these resources while protecting and enhancing the environment so that our productive capital capability is sustainable and renewable. Such issues are the proper concern of government because of the human damage inflicted on our social fabric as well as to economic growth in which every citizen is fairly included in the American dream.

Leave a comment