On April 17, 2013, Josh Boak and Eric Planin write in The Fiscal Times:
Obama’s new budget attempts a balancing act by simultaneously proposing major long term deficit reduction while advocating many billions of dollars in infrastructure construction and educational initiatives to create new jobs. But he is finding it difficult to placate both the right and the left.
“The President clearly is in a difficult position because you have a Republican House that believes the way out of this recession is to simply cut, cut, cut and more austerity for low and moderate-income people,” Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent from Vermont, told The Fiscal Times Tuesday. “I think that’s a disastrous idea both morally and economically.”
Other lawmakers have latched onto an idea that simplifying the tax code will somehow achieve what the past several years have not, even though total tax revenues are within historical norms.
“Reform itself is going to stimulate growth,” Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., told The Fiscal Times. “It would be a much more efficient code that would make our economy more competitive and help reduce complexity. That in and of itself is going to provide stimulus.”
Team Obama still sees brighter times ahead, even though in a major change it no longer predicts that GDP growth will climb above 4 percent at least once in the next decade.
No one can claim that an annual GDP growth rate of below 2 percent to a high of 4 percent is an achievement worth applause, but instead a gloomy prediction of our common FUTURE. That WILL BE THE END RESULT, UNLESS we reform the system and put into action financial mechanisms that finance FUTURE productive capital GDP growth while simultaneously creating opportunities for EVERY American to acquire over time a viable income-producing productive capital wealth portfolio paid for out of the future earnings (forced savings) of the investments. While it is absolutely necessary for the government to “spend” and “invest” in the private sector economy in order to stimulate significant GDP growth, there needs to be the stipulation requiring private sector companies receiving the monies and government contracts that they demonstrate broadened private ownership of the new productive capital assets among employees and citizens. Every effort must be made to broaden private, individual ownership of FUTURE productive capital wealth creation as tectonic shifts in the technologies of production will continue to destroy jobs and devalue the worth of workers.
The real reality is that unemployment and underemployment will worsen far more as technology progresses.
In the final analysis, JOB OPPORTUNITIES for the majority of Americans is headed to a dead end due to these technollogical tectonic shifts.
The Federal Reserve is dragging with in-action. There is no question that the Federal Reserve System needs to be reformed to act as a purveyor of economic growth. The focus should be on OWNERSHIP CREATION, which will result in real JOB CREATION as a result of future economic growth.
Influential economists and business leaders, as well as political leaders, should read Harold Moulton’s The Formation Of Capital, in which he argues that it makes no sense to finance new productive capital out of past savings. Instead, economic growth should be financed out of future earnings (savings), and provide that every citizen become an owner.
The Federal Reserve, which has been largely responsible for the powerlessness of most American citizens, should set an example for all the central banks in the world. Chairman Benjamin Bernanke and other members of the Federal Reserve need to wake-up and implement Section 13 paragraph 2, which directs the Federal Reserve to create credit for local banks to make loans where there isn’t enough savings in the system to finance economic growth. We should not destroy the Federal Reserve or make it a political extension of the Treasury Department, but instead reform it so that the American citizens in each of the 12 Federal Reserve Regions become the owners. The result will be that money power will flow from the bottom up, not from the top down––not for consumer credit, not for credit that doesn’t pay for itself or non-productive uses of credit, but for credit for productive uses to expand the economy’s rate of growth.
The systemic injustices of monopoly capitalism can only be addressed by comprehensive reforms to the tax, monetary and inheritance policies favoring the top 1 percent at the expense of the 99 percent. The current system perpetuates budget deficits and unsustainable government debt, underutilized workers, a lack of financing for financing advanced energy and green technologies, and outsourcing of U.S. industrial jobs to low-wage countries, trade deficits, shrinking consumption incomes among the poor and middle class, and conventional methods for financing productive growth that increase the ownership and power gaps between the top 1 percent and the 90 percent whose combined ownership accumulations are already less than the elite whose money power is widely known as the source of political corruption and the breakdown of political democracy.
The unworkability of the traditional market economy is evidenced by the diverse and growing deficits––federal budget deficit, trade deficit, city, county and state budget deficits––which are making it increasingly impossible for governments at every level to function. The increasing deficit burden is the result of the growing numbers of people who cannot earn, from legitimate participation in production, enough income to support themselves and their families. Thus government is obliged to “redistribute” to starve off economic collapse. The key means of redistribution is taxation––taking from the legitimate producers and giving to the non- or under-producers––to make up the economy’s ever wider income and purchasing power shortfalls.
The fact is that political democracy is impossible without economic democracy. Those who control money control the laws that foster wage slavery, welfare slavery, debt slavery and charity slavery. These laws can and should be changed by the 99 percent and those among the 1 percent who are committed to a just and economically classless market economy, true equality of opportunity, and a level playing field in the future for 100 percent of Americans. By adopting economic policies and programs that acknowledge every citizen’s right to become a capital worker as well as a labor worker, the result will be an end to perpetual labor servitude and the liberation of people from progressive increments of subsistence toil and compulsive poverty as the 99 percent benefits from the rewards of productive capital-sourced income.
The question that requires an answer is now timely before us. It was first posed by binary economist Louis Kelso in the 1950s but has never been thoroughly discussed on the national stage. Nor has there been the proper education of our citizenry that addresses what economic justice is and what ownership is. Therefore, by ignoring such issues of economic justice and ownership, our leaders are ignoring the concentration of power through ownership of productive capital, with the result of denying the 99 percenters equal opportunity to become capital owners. The question, as posed by Kelso is: “how are all individuals to be adequately productive when a tiny minority (capital workers) produce a major share and the vast majority (labor workers), a minor share of total goods and service,” and thus, “how do we get from a world in which the most productive factor—physical capital—is owned by a handful of people, to a world where the same factor is owned by a majority—and ultimately 100 percent—of the consumers, while respecting all the constitutional rights of present capital owners?”
Sign the Petition at http://signon.org/sign/amend-the-federal-reserve.fb27?source=c.fb&r_by=3904687
Sign the Petition at http://signon.org/sign/reform-the-federal-reserve.fb23?source=c.fb&r_by=3904687
Sign the WhiteHouse.gov petition at https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/amend-federal-reserve-act/GYqvqGr6
