On February 25, 2012, Bill Maher writes on his blog:
There’s a statistic that I think reveals something about the American economy that politicians of both parties know about privately, but lie about publicly. They repeat this notion that we’re going to bring back all of these jobs we’ve lost, or keep them from going overseas, or create lots of new ones in those industries, when the reality is that they’re not. And it’s not always because those jobs are gone. It’s usually that someone else is doing them — someone overseas or an immigrant or a robot. Lord help us if they invent a Mexican robot.
And here’s the stat: The unemployment rate for someone who didn’t graduate high school is 12%. If you only graduated high school it’s 8.1%. But if you went to college it’s only 3.7%. Unless you majored in art history. Then you blow people for cash to smoke rocks.
And that’s the new reality: for our most educated workers there wasn’t much of a recession. From 2007 to 2013, Whole Foods was always crowded. For the rest of America, there was a huge recession and it’s still going. And this is because the economy is changing, and “surprise, surprise, surprise!” it favors people who had the money to go to Wesleyan.
This is the new reality: you’ve got to have a J.O.B. if you want to be with me, and a G.E.D. ain’t getting you the J.O.B. Not anymore. Because we’ve taken lots of those jobs and either outsourced them to someone named Ling or Sanjay who’ll do it cheaper, not to mention better, or we’ve automated them. The only thing left is sandwich artist. Or burger flipper. And don’t think McDonald’s isn’t going to figure out a way to eliminate those jobs too. Soon you’ll order what you want on your phone, and a burger will drop out of a machine, and then you’ll eat it and die.
Think of the people who used to work in the checkout line at the Vons, and the pimpled teen who used to bag your groceries. Well, now we have self-checkout, so that’s one less job for the clerk and the pimpled teen. Now they have to sell rocks to the art major.
Customer service jobs have been replaced by extremely irritating automated voice technology. Driverless cars are coming in the not-too-distant future, so subtract all of the jobs for drivers, cabbies and truckers from the pile of available blue-collar work. Soon you get to see what’s happening: automation and robots are good for the company that makes them, the engineers with the PhDs who design them, and the CEOs who get to lower their labor costs. Same with outsourcing: it’s good for owners and investors. Who it’s not good for is the worker it’s replacing. It leaves fewer and fewer jobs for those workers to do. So, I understand why the Tea Party is mad. I’m just saying it’s not black people…it’s robots.
Now, I’m not saying there aren’t any jobs for someone without a high school degree. Look at all the Palin kids. They’re employed. I think. Okay, bad example.
But in the new economy you’re going to need education and skills, or you’re going to be fighting over the scraps. We need more people who graduate in the sciences and math, who go on to be engineers and technicians…so God made a farmer.
And that’s why I’m saying: forget God. He keeps giving us farmers. We don’t need any more farmers, God! Quit it!
Seriously, what was that Super Bowl ad? “Farmers get up early and have dirt under their nails. Now buy this truck.” Wha?? And the tagline was “For the farmer in all of us.” I mean, I’ve dabbled in hydroponics, but I don’t think there’s a farmer in me. Though I did black out once in the South and…anything is possible.
But back to the point: in Primary Colors, you’ll remember the scene where Clinton tells a bunch of blue collar factory workers that their jobs aren’t coming back, and that he’s not going to lie to them. I wish Obama would give that sort of speech as well.
Because despite the sizable portion of America who wants to hear “We’re the greatest country in the world! With the greatest people in the world! With the best health care!” I still think that’s the minority. More and more, Americans want authentic. They want to hear at least a little truth. That’s why Chris Christie is so popular, despite being kind of a prick: because people finally sense that he’s a guy who isn’t playing a character. That’s the actual man. And he’s hungry for change. Also baby back ribs.
While America needs and will continue to need educated and skilled workers who can make and fix software and machines, still private sector job creation in numbers that match the pool of people willing and able to work will continue to be eroded by physical productive capital’s ever increasing role. As for jobs, they will be limited to the highly-skilled and technical variety, which is far too limited to solve the reality that by the year 2020, more than 50 percent of the jobs available will be minimum wage jobs!
There’s nothing new about machines replacing people, but the rate of replacement is exponential and the result is that productivity gains lead to more wealth for the OWNERS of the non-human factor of production, but for others who have always been dependent on jobs as their source of income, there has been a steady decline to poverty-level labor incomes.
But what about China, the place where all the manufacturing jobs are supposedly going? True, China has added manufacturing jobs over the past 15 years. But now it is beginning its shift to super-robotic automation. Foxconn, which manufactures the iPhone and many other consumer electronics and is China’s largest private employer, has plans to install over a million manufacturing robots within three years. Thus, in reality off-shoring of manufacturing will eventually be replaced by human-intelligent super-robotic automation.
The pursuit for lower and lower cost production that relies on slave wage labor will eventually run out of places to chase. Eventually, “rich” countries, whose productive capital capability is owned by its citizens, will be forced to “re-shore” manufacturing capacity, and result in every-cheaper robotic manufacturing.
“The era we’re in is one in which the scope of tasks that can be automated is increasing rapidly, and in areas where we used to think those were our best skills, things that require thinking,” says David Autor, a labor economist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Businesses are spending more on technology now because they spent so little during the recession. Yet total capital expenditures are still barely running ahead of replacement costs. “Most of the investment we’re seeing is simply replacing worn-out stuff,” says economist Paul Ashworth of Capital Economics.
Yet, while the problem is one that no one can no longer ignore, the solution also is one starring them in the face but they just can’t see the simplicity of it.
The fundamental challenge to be solved is how do we reinvent and redesign our economic institutions to keep pace with job destroying and devaluing technological innovation and invention so not all of the benefits of owning FUTURE productive capacity accrues to today’s wealthy 1 percent ownership class, and ownership is broadened so that EVERY American earns income through stock ownership dividends so they can afford to purchase the products and services produced by the economy.
None of this is new from a macro-economic viewpoint as productive capital is increasingly the source of the world’s economic growth. The role of physical productive capital is to do ever more of the work of producing more products and services, which produces income to its owners. Full employment is not an objective of businesses. Companies strive to keep labor input and other costs at a minimum. Private sector job creation in numbers that match the pool of people willing and able to work is constantly being eroded by physical productive capital’s ever increasing role. Over the past century there has been an ever-accelerating shift to productive capital––which reflects tectonic shifts in the technologies of production. The mixture of labor worker input and capital worker input has been rapidly changing at an exponential rate of increase for over 235 years in step with the Industrial Revolution (starting in 1776) and had even been changing long before that with man’s discovery of the first tools, but at a much slower rate. Up until the close of the nineteenth century, the United States remained a working democracy, with the production of products and services dependent on labor worker input. When the American Industrial Revolution began and subsequent technological advance amplified the productive power of non-human capital, plutocratic finance channeled its ownership into fewer and fewer hands, as we continue to witness today with government by the wealthy evidenced at all levels.
People invented tools to reduce toil, enable otherwise impossible production, create new highly automated industries, and significantly change the way in which products and services are produced from labor intensive to capital intensive––the core function of technological invention. Binary economist Louis Kelso attributed most changes in the productive capacity of the world since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution to technological improvements in our capital assets, and a relatively diminishing proportion to human labor. Capital, in Kelso’s terms, does not “enhance” labor productivity (labor’s ability to produce economic goods). In fact, the opposite is true. It makes many forms of labor unnecessary. Because of this undeniable fact, Kelso asserted that, “free-market forces no longer establish the ‘value’ of labor. Instead, the price of labor is artificially elevated by government through minimum wage legislation, overtime laws, and collective bargaining legislation or by government employment and government subsidization of private employment solely to increase consumer income.”
Furthermore, according to Kelso, productive capital is increasingly the source of the world’s economic growth and, therefore, should become the source of added property ownership incomes for all. Kelso postulated that if both labor and capital are interdependent factors of production, and if capital’s proportionate contributions are increasing relative to that of labor, then equality of opportunity and economic justice demands that the right to property (and access to the means of acquiring and possessing property) must in justice be extended to all. Yet, sadly, the American people and its leaders still pretend to believe that labor is becoming more productive.
A National Right To Capital Ownership Bill that restores the American dream should be advocated by the progressive movement, which addresses the reality of Americans facing job opportunity deterioration and devaluation due to tectonic shifts in the technologies of production.
There is a solution, which will result in double-digit economic growth and simultaneously broaden private, individual ownership so that EVERY American’s income significantly grows, providing the means to support themselves and their families with an affluent lifestyle. The Just Third Way Master Plan for America’s future is published at http://foreconomicjustice.org/?p=5797.
The solution is obvious but our leaders, academia, conventional economist and the media are oblivious to the necessity to broaden ownership in the new capital formation of the future simultaneously with the growth of the economy, which then becomes self-propelled as increasingly more Americans accumulate ownership shares and earn a new source of dividend income derived from their capital ownership in the “machines” that are replacing them or devaluing their labor value.
The solution will require the reform of the Federal Reserve Bank to create new owners of future productive capital investment in businesses simultaneously with the growth of the economy. The solution to broadening private, individual ownership of America’s future capital wealth requires that the Federal Reserve stop monetizing unproductive debt, including bailouts of banks “too big to fail” and Wall Street derivatives speculators, and begin creating an asset-backed currency that could enable every man, woman and child to establish a Capital Homestead Account or “CHA” (a super-IRA or asset tax-shelter for citizens) at their local bank to acquire a growing dividend-bearing stock portfolio to supplement their incomes from work and all other sources of income. Policies need to insert American citizens into the low or no-interest investment money loop to enable non- and undercapitalized Americans, including the working class and poor, to build wealth and become “customers with money.” The proposed Capital Homestead Act would produce this result.
Support the Capital Homestead Act at http://www.cesj.org/homestead/index.htm and http://www.cesj.org/homestead/summary-cha.htm
Sign the Petition at http://signon.org/sign/reform-the-federal-reserve.fb23?source=c.fb&r_by=3904687
Sign the WhiteHouse.gov petition at https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/reform-federal-reserve/PhY3Jswk
