19th Ave New York, NY 95822, USA

China Eagerly Buying Up American Assets [To Own America] (Demo)

Gerry Lopez, left, CEO of AMC, joins Zhang Lin, Vice President of Wanda, at a ceremony to mark the acquisition of the U.S. cinema chain. (Ng Han Guan / Associated Press / August 24, 2012)

On August 25, 2012, David Pierson and Don Lee write in the Los Angeles Times that Chinese firms see bargains in the U.S., as well as opportunities for technological gain and  expanded reach.

…the Chinese see a prime opportunity to rummage through the bargain bins of rich countries to gain technological know-how and international reach.

They’re also hedging against rising costs and uncertainties inside China. The world’s second-largest economy is struggling with its slowest growth rate since the financial crisis in 2008.

“The Chinese growth model is changing fundamentally,” said Thilo Hanemann, research director for the New York-based Rhodium Group, which tracks Chinese direct investment.

“Chinese companies need to escape the profit squeeze in low-end manufacturing and move up and down the value chain. Expanding investment in developed economies is an essential part of that,” Hanemann said.

Although China has tight capital controls, that nation’s government officials want companies to go after new technologies and diversify their markets.

“The Chinese government has given an implicit green light to reach overseas to secure assets that will help Chinese businesses thrive in the long term,” said David Wolf, the Beijing-based head of the Wolf Group Asia consulting firm.

That’s worrying some Washington officials, who fear that the United States is selling off valuable assets to the Chinese, ultimately at the expense of American jobs.

One of the leading impediments then — and now — is the suspicion that Chinese companies act on behalf of China’sCommunist Party rulers, rather than shareholders. State-run firms represent about 90 percent of Chinese outbound investment, according to the Heritage Foundation.

China contends that this investment has kept American companies alive and created thousands of U.S. jobs. Chinese President Hu Jintao said as much during a visit to the U.S. last year when he toured Wanxiang’s existing Illinois facility and met with other Chinese companies that had U.S. operations.

Across other industries, Chinese corporations are buying into American companies for their prowess in branding, marketing and research capabilities.

Compared with Japan and other economic powers, China’s foreign investment is still relatively modest. With global holdings estimated at $364 billion, China is on par with Ireland or Sweden, according to the research firm Rhodium Group.

Due to the stupidity of our national leadership, academia, and media, Americans have and continue to facilitate foreign interests in BUYING America in the name of JOB CREATION. The Times authors never use the term OWNERSHIP but rather BUY assets, which should be defined as everything other than labor that is a productive component in the creation of products and services––aka productive capital or capital––embodied in innovation, invention, human-intelligent machines, superautomation, robotics, digital computerized operations, and other prowess in branding, marketing and research capabilities. This non-human factor of production is the essence of wealth building.

Instead America is focus on JOB CREATION while the real job creation engine is economic growth embodied in the tectonic shifts in the technologies of production. It American assets and future growth projections are seen as profitable investment ventures by foreign interests then WHY NOT  for Americans?

The REAL SOLUTION is to finance future economic growth of American business corporations by empowering EVERY American to acquire private, individual ownership in the eonomy’s future income-producing productive capital assets. Rather than the Federal Reserve providing money to banks for non-productive lending, Chairman Benjamin Bernanke and other members of the Federal Reserve need to wake-up and implement Section 13 paragraph 2, which directs the Federal Reserve to create credit for local banks to make loans where there isn’t enough savings in the system to finance economic growth. Thus, capital investment loans should be made to EVERY American with payback provided by the future earnings of the investments. This would free economic grwoth from the slavery of “past” savings. The Federal Reserve should stop monetizing unproductive debt, including bailouts of banks “too big to fail” and Wall Street derivatives speculators, and begin creating an asset-backed currency that could enable every man, woman and child to establish a Capital Homestead Account or “CHA” (a super-IRA or asset tax-shelter for citizens) at their local bank to acquire a growing dividend-bearing stock portfolio to supplement their incomes from work and all other sources of income.
The Federal Reserve Bank should be used to provide interest-free capital credit (including only transaction and risk premiums) and monetize each capital formation transaction, determined by the same expertise that determines it today––management and banks––that each transaction is viably feasible so that there is virtually no risk in the Federal Reserve. The first layer of risk would be taken by the commercial credit insurers, backed by a new government corporation, the Capital Diffusion Reinsurance Corporation, through which the loans could be guaranteed. This entity would fulfill the government’s responsibility for the health and prosperity of the American economy.
The monies would be strictly allocated for investment in the economic growth of the economy, and taking advantage of the Capital Homestead Account investment monies would be voluntary on the part of business corporations with the stipulation that the stockholders would receive the full-dividend payouts of the earnings and when the loan is repaid, continue to benefit from the full-dividend income stream.
Such a solution does not require redistribution or hoping that business corporations will increase their labor costs by  paying higher wages and salaries otherwise not supported by free market competition. Such polities will simultaneously grow America’s productive capacity and provide people with income to buy the products and services produced, restoring the necessary balance between production and consumption.
The Federal Reserve Board is already empowered under Section 13 of the Federal Reserve Act to reform monetary policy to discourage non-productive uses of credit, to encourage accelerated rates of private sector growth, and to promote widespread individual access to productive credit as a fundamental right of citizenship. The Federal Reserve Board needs to re-activate its discount mechanism to encourage private sector growth linked to expanded capital ownership opportunities for all Americans. Such policies will increase corporate profits because Americans will end up with more spending money, which in turn, will increase profits and more money to spend by consumers on the products and services produced.

Why this approach?
Soon, industrial monopoly capitalism will reach its twin goals: concentration of productive capital ownership among the elite ownership class and work performed with as few labor workers and the lowest possible wages and salaries. The question to be answered is “Then what?”

Of course, to reach this twin goal will require “investment.” The term “invest” sounds good on paper or in speeches, especially when justified on the basis that investment will create JOBS. But the reality is that no one is addressing the CONCENTRATED OWNERSHIP of the income-producing assets that result from investments under the current financial system. Such assets created by investment are the result of tectonic shifts in the technologies of production, which is the real reason, as well as outsourcing, that jobs are being destroyed and degraded in terms of wage and salary levels. Until a Romney or Obama address this BIG ISSUE, unemployment and welfare roles will dramatically expand. It is only through future investment with the stipulation of simultaneously broadening private, individual ownership of income-producing productive capital––the non-human means of production embodied in human-intelligent machines, superautomation, robotics, digital computerized operations, etc.––that we will be able to enrich EVERY American’s life.

As a nation, we continue to ignore the possibility of democratizing future ownership of labor-displacing productive capital technologies and rising ownership incomes as a market-generated means of eliminating wage slavery, welfare slavery, debt slavery and charity slavery for the 99 percent of humanity. Binary economist Louis Kelso argued that the Keynesian model fails to recognize that “when capital workers replace labor workers as the major suppliers of goods and services, labor employment alone becomes inadequate because labor’s share of the income arising from production cannot provide the progressively better standard of living that technology is making possible. Labor produces subsistence at best. Capital can produce affluence. To enjoy affluence, all households must engage to an increasing extent in capital work [ownership]”

For decades employment opportunity in the United States was such that the majority of people could obtain a job that could support their livelihood, though in most cases related to a family, it required the father and mother to both work, if they aspired to live a “middle class” lifestyle. With “Free Trade” those opportunities began to disintegrate as corporations sought to seek lower cost production taking advantage of global cheap labor rates and non-regulation, as well as lower tax rates abroad. This resulted in a chain reaction forcing more and more companies to out-source in order to stay competitive (thus the rise of China, Indiana Mexico, and other third-world nations economies).

At the same time tectonic shifts in the technologies of production were exponentially occurring (and continue to do so), which resulted in less job opportunities as production was shifted from people making things to “machines” of technology making things, The combination of cheap global labor costs and lower long-term invested “machine” costs has forced the value of labor downward and this will continue to be the reality. Our only way to far greater prosperity, opportunity, and economic justice is to embrace technological innovation and invention and the resulting human-intelligent machines, superautomation, robotics, digital computerized operations, etc as the primary economic engine of growth.

But significantly, unless we reform our system to empower EVERY American to acquire, via insured capital loans, viable full-ownership holdings (and thus entitlement to full-dividend earnings) in the companies growing the economy with the future earnings of the investments paying for the initial loan debt to acquire ownership, then the concentration of ownership of ALL future productive capital will continue to be amassed by a wealthy minority. Companies will continue to globalized in search of “customers” with money or simply fail, as exponentially there will be fewer and fewer customers to support their businesses worldwide. Why, because the majority will be disconnected from the income derived from the non-human means of production that is replacing the need for labor workers.

Education is not the solution, though it is critical for our future societal development. But except for a relative few, the majority of the population, no matter how well educated, will not be able to find a job that pays sufficient wages or salaries to support a family or to prevent a lifestyle which is gradually being crippled by near poverty or poverty earnings.

Already, GDP growth is at a near standstill. Lowering taxes on the wealthy ownership class will not much impact this reality because they will not invest unless their are customers to create demand.  This will continue to be the reality unless we reform the system to connect the majority of people to the property rights of the non-human production of products and services while simultaneously spurring economic growth, and entitle them to the earnings of capital (dividends, interest and rent) as a second income source to supplement their earnings from their labor in the short-term, with the long-term lifetime goal of earnings from capital ownership being the primary source of their income. This is the ONLY way to strengthen individuals and empower them to become personally responsible for their lives and not depended on taxpayer redistribution and national debt to sustain welfare support, open or concealed.

America’s leaders, academia and  media need to reassess their focus on JOB CREATION and embrace the goal of universal CAPITAL OWNERSHIP if we are to bring about the necessary paradigm shift necessary to put America on the path to prosperity, opportunity, and economic justice.

Please see my article “Democratic Capitalism And Binary Economics: Solutions For A Troubled Nation and Economy” at http://foreconomicjustice.com/11/economic-justice/ or follow me on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/For-Economic-Justice/347893098576250 and http://www.facebook.com/editorgary

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-china-us-investing-20120825,0,4780772.story?page=1

Leave a comment