On November 30, 2014, Sean McElwee writes on Salon:
“If we want to curb the worst Wall Street abuses, and also make America a more equitable place, here’s what to do.”

The financial industry is a behemoth. Over the past 150 years, it has grown dramaticallyas a share of GDP. And entrance into its ranks has become a great way to enter into the top 1 percent of earners. (According to recent data, financial professionals have nearly doubled as a share of Americans in the top 1 percent.) At the same time, Wall Street is one of the most reviled institutions in the United States, with a recent study finding the lowest trust in finance recorded over 40 years.
Here are three good reasons to be distrustful of Wall Street, followed by one policy that would address all of them.
1. The Financial Industry Engages in Rent-Seeking
In economics, rent-seeking is the practice of making money simply by moving money around and collecting the resulting fees, rather than by facilitating profitable investment. The latter role is necessary for functioning markets; rent-seeking, however, is not.
There is now a strong literature suggesting that at some point, finance largely becomes extractive, while remaining at the same efficiency level. Thomas Philippon finds that the cost of financial intermediation has not fallen in 30 years. As Gautam Mukunda writes in a recent Harvard Business Review article, “Creative work increases a society’s wealth. Distributive work just moves wealth from one hand to another. Every industry contains both. But activity in the financial sector is primarily distributive.” Other studies come to the same conclusion:
- Ozgur Orhangazi finds a negative relationship between real investment and financialization. The author proposes two channels to explain the relationship: “First, increased financial investment and increased financial profit opportunities may have crowded out real investment by changing the incentives of firm managers and directing funds away from real investment.”
- Stephen Cecchetti and Enisse Kharroubi examine a sample of developed and emerging economies and find that financial development is good for emerging economies, but is detrimental to productivity growth for advanced economies.
- Jean-Louis Arcand, Enrico Berkes and Ugo Panizza find that when private sector credit exceeds 110 percent of GDP finance begins to become a drag on growth, a situation the U.S. is currently in.
Rent-seeking is the practice of making money simply by moving money around and collecting the resulting fees, rather than by facilitating profitable investment. Rent-seeking is based on a desire to get rich through speculation and is limited to those who have “past” savings and who have accumulated capital asset ownership. The speculation is conducted in the casino stock markets.
The real reason that there has been a decline of income share accruing to labor in developed countries, besides that the financial industry primarily distributes wealth upward due to the requirements for “past” savings gambled in speculative markets, is because labor is not sharing in the ownership (as individuals) in the productive non-human factor (land, structures, tools, machines, robotics, computerization, etc.) that is exponentially replacing the necessity for labor to produce products and services. Tectonic shifts in the technologies of production are destroying jobs and devaluing the worth of labor as increasing numbers of unemployed and under-employed workers are competing for fewer and fewer jobs, and as corporations seek lower labor costs abroad.
Because relatively few low-income and middle-income families own financial assets, due to insufficient income to save and invest, all the investment opportunities in wealth-creating, income-producing capital assets benefit ONLY those with “past” savings––the present-day wealthy ownership class, whose wealth comes from owning capital asset equities.
The solution offered is to impose a financial transactions tax to reduce speculation and generate significant revenue to the State to support redistribution programs.
But this proposal ONLY addresses the symptoms of a broken system in which economic growth is hindered by the slavery to “past” savings as the primary means necessary to financing economic growth. It does not provide the necessary system reforms to abate the harm the unprecedented rise of finance is doing to the real economy, which is resulting in propelled wealth inequality while at the same time crating opportunities for rent-seeking.
The most significant system reform needed is to equally empower EVERY citizen, without the requirement of “past” savings or capital asset equities, to acquire personal ownership shares in FUTURE wealth-creating, income-producing capital asset growth. This can be accomplished using insured, interest-free capital credit loans issued by local banks repayable out of the FUTURE dividend earnings generated by profitable investments in the corporations growing the economy. This objective can be achieved with the passage of the proposed Capital Homestead Act.
Support the Capital Homestead Act at http://www.cesj.org/learn/capital-homesteading/capital-homestead-act-a-plan-for-getting-ownership-income-and-power-to-every-citizen/ and http://www.cesj.org/learn/capital-homesteading/capital-homestead-act-summary/.
“