Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) is a Keynesian economics scheme which creates new money for spending to give politicians and their parties what their base wants. The new money is not asset-base, meaning the money is not used specifically to create new productive wealth to produce goods, products, and services.
The problem is if you assume that the money supply, and thus the source of financing for new capital projects, can only be backed by government debt, that, in effect, creates a Catch-22 situation. You can’t have growth unless you burden yourself with debt that you are already unable to repay (now at over $22 trillion). If you grow economically, you assume more debt you can’t repay, and if you repay debt (or try to) through taxation you won’t be able to grow to finance the debt repayment, which eats up tax revenues.
The fact of the matter is that the problem of financing growth can be solved with ease, and in a way that not only doesn’t require additional government debt, it can lead to paying down the debt that is already outstanding. The only thing that absolutely must be done is to start using the banking system — the commercial banks backed up with the central bank, the Federal Reserve — the way it was intended to be used: to finance private sector development, not to monetize government deficits.
Central banks were not invented to finance government operations, nor are commercial banks engaged in a criminal conspiracy against the people by creating money that only government has the right to create. The fact is that government doesn’t actually have a natural right to create money.
Only natural persons have natural rights, and a government is an artificial person, a “legal fiction” created by human beings who are natural persons. When we say a government has no natural right to create money, we mean that the nature of government is such that it does not as one of its natural functions create money.
That is not the same as saying that government does not have the right by nature to regulate the currency and enforce contracts. Money derives from production, however, and government by its nature is not a producer of marketable goods, products and services that require money to be exchanged. Government is a service for which the citizens pay a fee called “taxes” in order to receive the services. Allowing government to create money means that it is not accountable to that degree to the citizens — which means the government is in charge, not the citizens.
So what our country could do, and in fact should be doing, along with everybody else, is turning the value of existing inventories of goods into money for trade and commerce and turning the value of future productive capital into money for new productive capital formation. That is what commercial banks were invented to do in the first place, with central banks assisting to make it easier. All government has to do is set the value of the currency, and make certain all contracts are kept.
That is the short term solution. It gets any country out of the hole they’re in with respect to the presumed scarcity of money. The long term solution is to get everybody on board with the program by making it possible for everybody to purchase part (shares) of the new capital formation that would be financed. By everybody we mean starting at birth with EVERY child, woman and man. They can do this by purchasing newly issued shares that finance the new productive capital projects using insured, interest-free capital credit (new money), making dividends tax deductible at the corporate level, paying out all earnings as dividends, and repaying the credit extended to purchase shares out of the dividends on a tax-deferred basis.
Afterwards, the dividends can be taxed as personal income to the recipient and the balance used for consumption purposes. This would take a great burden off the government and increase tax revenues at the same time, allowing repayment of the outstanding debt without imposing austerity measures that only cripple growth.
Such a program is described in the Center for Economic and Social Justice’s (www.cesj.org) Capital Homesteading proposal. It’s something to think about. See the proposed Capital Homestead Act (aka Economic Democracy Act and Economic Empowerment Act) athttp://www.cesj.org/learn/capital-homesteading/, http://www.cesj.org/…/capital-homestead-act-a-plan-for-get…/, http://www.cesj.org/…/capita…/capital-homestead-act-summary/ andhttp://www.cesj.org/learn/capital-homesteading/ch-vehicles/. And The Capital Homestead Act brochure, pdf print version athttp://www.cesj.org/…/uploads/2014/11/C-CHAflyer_1018101.pdf and Capital Homestead Accounts (CHAs) at http://www.cesj.org/…/ch-v…/capital-homestead-accounts-chas/