19th Ave New York, NY 95822, USA

The World Needs Another 95 Million Skilled Workers By 2020 (Demo)

On June 21, 2012, Michael Kelley writes on the Business Insider that strains in the global labor market could lead to a surplus of up to 95 million low-skilled workers and a shortage of up to 95 million high- and medium-skilled workers by 2020.

According to a recent report by the McKinsey Global Institute (MGI) the conclusion was that unless there is a immediate and massive global effort to improve worker skills, there will be “far too few workers with the advanced skills needed to drive a high-productivity economy and far too few job opportunities for low-skill workers.”

One paragraph is particularly foreboding:

“For advanced economies, such imbalances would likely lead to more long- term and permanent joblessness. More young people without post-secondary training would fail to get a start in the job market and older workers would drop out because they don’t qualify for jobs that are being created. The polarization of incomes between high- and low-skill workers could become even more pronounced, slowing the advance in national living standards, and increasing public-sector burdens and social tensions. In some advanced economies, less-skilled workers could very well grow up poorer than their parents, in real terms.”

This is such an obvious conclusion. What is consistently missed is the realization that  economists and analysts should recognize that there are two factors of production: people (labor workers who contribute manual, intellectual, creative and entrepreneurial work) and capital (land; structures; infrastructure; tools; machines; computer processing; certain intangibles that have the characteristics of property, such as patents and trade or firm names; and the like owned by capital workers). Fundamentally, economic value is created through human and non-human contributions.
Once this concept is understood, then the following should be evident:  The role of physical productive capital is to do ever more of the work, which produces income. Full employment is not an objective of businesses. Companies strive to keep labor input and other costs at a minimum. Private sector job creation in numbers that match the pool of people willing and able to work is constantly being eroded by physical productive capital’s ever increasing role. Over the past century there has been an ever-accelerating shift to productive capital––which reflects tectonic shifts in the technologies of production.
One can then realize that our scientists, engineers, and executive managers who are not owners themselves of the productive capital they create, except for those in the highest employed positions, are encouraged to work to destroy employment by making the capital worker owner more productive. How much employment can be destroyed by substituting machines for people is a measure of their success––always focused on producing at the lowest cost. Only the people who already own productive capital are the beneficiaries of their work, as they systematically concentrate more and more capital ownership in their stationary 1 percent ranks. Yet the 1 percent are not the people who do the overwhelming consuming. The result is the consumer populous is not able to get the money to buy the products and services produced as a result of substituting machines for people. And yet you can’t have mass production without mass human consumption. It is the exponential disassociation of production and consumption that is the problem in the United States economy, and the reason that ordinary citizens must gain access to productive capital ownership to improve their economic well-being.
Thus, while we do in fact need skilled educated labor workers for the continued development of the Third Industrial Revolution embodied in machines, superautomation, robotics, digital computerized operations, etc., we must reform the economic system to connect ALL citizens, via private, individual ownership, to the future productive capital assets resulting from technological innovation and invention. We must face the fact that a majority of the people will not be needed to produce the bulk of the products and services. By broadening private, individual ownership of future productive capital creation among ALL Americans, long-term and permanent “conventional” employment would not be an issue, as peoples would earn income through their capital ownership to support the demand and purchase of products and services produced by largely non-human means of production.

Leave a comment